CHAPTER XXI.

    What, then, is justice? We distinctly remember what in the course of 
our argument we said in the commencement of this treatise; namely, that man 
was fashioned in imitation of the Divine nature, preserving his resemblance 
to the Deity as well in other excellences as in possession of freedom of 
the will yet being of necessity of a nature subject to change. For it was 
not possible that a being who derived his origin from an alteration should 
be altogether free from this liability. For the passing from a state of 
non-existence into that of existence is a kind of alteration when being, 
that is, by the exercise of Divine power takes the place of nonentity. In 
the following special respect, too, alteration is necessarily observable in 
man, namely, because man was an imitation of the Divine nature, and unless 
some distinctive difference had been occasioned, the imitating subject 
would be entirely the same as that which it resembles; but in this 
instance, it is to be observed, there is a difference between that which 
"was made in the image" and its pattern; namely this, that the one is not 
subject to change, while the other is (for, as has been described, it has 
come into existence through an alteration), and being thus subject to 
alteration does not always continue in its existing state. For alteration 
is a kind of movement ever advancing from the present state to another; and 
there are two forms of this movement; the one being ever towards what is 
good, and in this the advance has no check, because no goal of the course 
to be traversed (8) can be reached, while the other is in the direction of 
the contrary, and of it this is the essence, that it has no subsistence; 
for, as has been before stated, the contrary state to goodness conveys some 
such notion of opposition, as when we say, for instance, that that which is 
is logically opposed to that which is not, and that existence is so opposed 
to non-existence. Since, then, by reason of this impulse and movement of 
changeful alteration it is not possible that the nature of the subject of 
this change should remain self-centred and unmoved, but there is always 
something towards which the will is tending, the appetency for moral beauty 
naturally drawing it on to movement, this beauty is in one instance really 
such in its nature, in another it is not so, only blossoming with an 
illusive appearance of beauty; and the criterion of these two kinds is the 
mind that dwells within us. Under these circumstances it is a matter of 
risk whether we  happen to choose the real beauty, or whether  we are 
diverted from its choice by some deception arising from appearance, and 
thus drift away to the opposite; as happened, we are told in the heathen 
fable, to the dog which looked askance at the reflection in the water of 
what it carried in its mouth, but let go the real food, and, opening its 
mouth wide to swallow the image of it, still hungered. Since, then, the 
mind has been disappointed in its craving for the real good, and diverted 
to that which is not such, being persuaded, through the deception of the 
great advocate and inventor of vice, that that was beauty which was just 
the opposite (for this deception would never have succeeded, had not the 
glamour of beauty been spread over the hook of vice like a bait),--the man, 
I say, on the one hand, who had enslaved himself by indulgence to the enemy 
of his life, being of his own accord in this unfortunate condition,--I ask 
you to investigate, on the other hand, those qualities which suit and go 
along with our conception of the Deity, such as goodness, wisdom, power, 
immortality, and all else that has the stamp of superiority. As good, then, 
the Deity entertains pity for fallen man; as wise He is not ignorant of the 
means for his recovery; while a just decision must also form part of that 
wisdom; for no one would ascribe that genuine justice to the absence of 
wisdom.

CHAPTER XXII.

    What, then, under these circumstances is justice? It is the not 
exercising any arbitrary sway over him who has us in his power (9), nor, by 
tearing us away by a violent exercise of force from his hold, thus leaving 
some colour for a just complaint to him who enslaved man through sensual 
pleasure. For as they who have bartered away their freedom for money are 
the slaves of those who have purchased them (for they have constituted 
themselves their own sellers, and it is not allowable either for themselves 
or any one else in their behalf to call freedom to their aid, not even 
though those who have thus reduced themselves to this sad state are of 
noble birth; and, if any one out of regard for the person who has so sold 
himself should use violence against him who has bought him, he will clearly 
be acting unjustly in thus arbitrarily rescuing one who has been legally 
purchased as a slave, whereas, if he wishes to pay a price to get such a 
one away, there is no law to prevent that), on the same principle, now that 
we had voluntarily bartered away our freedom, it was requisite that no 
arbitrary method of recovery, but the one consonant with justice (1) should 
be devised by Him Who in His goodness had undertaken our rescue. Now this 
method is in a measure this; to make over to the master of the slave 
whatever ransom he may agree to accept for the person in his possession.

CHAPTER XXIII.

    What, then, was it likely that the master of the slave would choose to 
receive in his stead? It is possible in the way of inference to make a 
guess as to his wishes in the matter, if, that is, the manifest indications 
of what we  are seeking for should come into our hands. He then, who, as we 
before stated in the beginning of this treatise, shut his eyes to the good 
in his envy of man in his happy condition, he who generated in himself the 
murky cloud of wickedness, he who suffered from the disease of the love of 
rule, that primary and fundamental cause of propension to the bad and the 
mother, so to speak, of all the wickedness that follows,--what would he 
accept in exchange for the thing which he held, but something, to be sure, 
higher and better, in the way of ransom, that thus, by receiving a gain in 
the exchange, he might foster the more his own special passion of pride? 
Now unquestionably in not one of those who had lived in history from the 
beginning of the world had he been conscious of any such circumstance as he 
observed to surround Him Who then manifested Himself, i.e. conception 
without carnal connection, birth without impurity, motherhood with 
virginity, voices of the unseen testifying from above to a transcendent 
worth, the healing of natural disease, without the use of means and of an 
extraordinary character, proceeding from Him by the mere utterance of a 
word and exercise of His will, the restoration of the dead to life, the 
absolution of the damned (2), the fear with which He inspired devils, His 
power over tempests, His walking through the sea, not by the waters 
separating on either side, and, as in the case of Moses' miraculous power, 
making bare its depths for those who passed through, but by the surface of 
the water presenting solid ground for His feet, and by a firm and hard 
resistance supporting His steps; then, His disregard for food as long as it 
pleased Him to abstain, His abundant banquets in the wilderness wherewith 
many thousands were fully fed (though neither did the heavens pour down 
manna on them, nor was their need supplied by the earth producing corn for 
them in its natural way, but that instance of munificence (3) came out of 
the ineffable store-houses of His Divine power), the bread ready in the 
hands of those who distributed it, as if they were actually reaping it, and 
becoming more, the more the eaters were filled; and then, the banquet on 
the fish; not that the sea supplied their need, but He Who had stocked the 
sea with its fish. But how is it possible to narrate in succession each one 
of the Gospel miracles? The Enemy, therefore, beholding in Him such power, 
saw also in Him an opportunity for an advance, in the exchange, upon the 
value of what he held. For this reason he chooses Him as a ransom (4) for 
those who were shut up in the prison of death. But it was out of his power 
to look on the unclouded aspect of God; he must see in Him some portion of 
that fleshly nature which through sin he had so long held in bondage. 
Therefore it was that the Deity was invested with the flesh, in order, that 
is, to secure that he, by looking upon something congenial and kindred to 
himself, might have no fears in approaching that supereminent power; and 
might yet by perceiving that power, showing as it did, yet only gradually, 
more and more splendour in the miracles, deem what was seen an object of 
desire rather than of fear. Thus, you see how goodness was conjoined with 
justice, and how-wisdom was not divorced from them. For to have devised 
that the Divine power should have been containable in the envelopment of a 
body, :to the end that the Dispensation in our behalf might not be thwarted 
through any fear inspired by the Deity actually appearing, affords a 
demonstration of all these qualities at once-- goodness, wisdom, justice. 
His choosing to save man is a testimony of his goodness; His making the 
redemption of the captive a matter of exchange exhibits His justice, while 
the invention whereby He enabled the Enemy to apprehend that of which he 
was before incapable, is a manifestation of supreme wisdom.

CHAPTER XXIV.

    But possibly one who has given his attention to the course of the 
preceding remarks may inquire: "wherein is the power of the Deity, wherein 
is the imperishableness of that Divine power, to be traced in the processes 
you have described?" In order, therefore, to make this also clear, let us 
take a survey of the sequel of the Gospel mystery, where that Power 
conjoined with Love is more especially exhibited. In the first place, then, 
that the omnipotence of the Divine nature should have had strength to 
descend to the humiliation of humanity, furnishes a clearer proof of that 
omnipotence than even the greatness and supernatural character of the 
miracles. For that something pre-eminently great should be wrought out by 
Divine power is, in a manner, in accordance with, and consequent upon the 
Divine nature; nor is it startling to hear it said that the whole of the 
created world, and all that is understood to be beyond the range of visible 
things, subsists by the power of God, His will giving it existence 
according to His good pleasure. But this His descent to the humility of man 
is a kind of superabundant exercise of power, which thus finds no check 
even in directions which contravene nature. It is the peculiar property of 
the essence of fire to tend upwards; no one therefore, deems it wonderful 
in the case of flame to see that natural operation. But should the flame be 
seen to stream downwards, like heavy bodies, such a fact would be regarded 
as a miracle; namely, how fire still remains fire, and yet, by this change 
of direction in its motion, passes out of its nature by being borne 
downward. In like manner, it is not the vastness of the heavens, and the 
bright shining of its constellations, and the order of the universe and the 
unbroken administration over all existence that so manifestly displays the 
transcendent power of the Deity, as this condescension to the weakness of 
our nature; the way, in fact, in which sublimity, existing in lowliness, is 
actually seen in lowliness, and yet descends not from its height, and in 
which Deity, en-twined as it is with the nature of man, becomes this, and 
yet still is that. For since, as has been said before, it was not in the 
nature of the opposing power to come in contact with the undiluted presence 
of God, and to undergo His unclouded manifestation, therefore, in order to 
secure that the ransom in our behalf might be easily accepted by him who 
required it, the, Deity was hidden under the veil of our nature, that so, 
as with ravenous fish (5), the hook of the Deity might be gulped down along 
with the bait of flesh, and thus, life being introduced into the house of 
death, and light shining in darkness, that which is diametrically opposed 
to light and life might vanish; for it is not in the nature of darkness to 
remain when light is present, or of death to exist when life is active. Let 
us, then, by way of summary take up the train of the arguments for the 
Gospel mystery, and thus complete our answer to those who question this 
Dispensation of God, and show them on what ground it is that the Deity by a 
personal intervention works out the salvation of man. It is certainly most 
necessary that in every point the conceptions we entertain of the Deity 
should be such as befit the subject, and not that, while one idea worthy of 
His sublimity should be retained, another equally belonging to that 
estimate of Deity should be dismissed from it; on the contrary, every 
exalted notion, every devout thought, must most surely enter into our 
belief in God, and each must be made dependent on each in a necessary 
sequence. Well, then; it has been pointed out that His goodness, wisdom, 
justice, power, incapability of decay, are all of them in evidence in the 
doctrine of the Dispensation in which we are. His goodness is caught sight 
of in His election to save lost man; His wisdom and justice have been 
displayed in the method of our salvation; His power, in that, though born 
in the likeness and fashion of a man, on the lowly level of our nature, and 
in accordance with that likeness raising the expectation that he could be 
over-mastered by death, he, after such a birth, nevertheless produced the 
effects peculiar and natural to Him. Now it is the peculiar effect of light 
to make darkness vanish, and of life to destroy death. Since, then, we have 
been led astray from the right path, and diverted from that life which was 
ours at the beginning, and brought under the sway of death, what is there 
improbable in the lesson we are taught by the Gospel mystery, if it be 
this; that cleansing reaches those who are befouled with sin, and life the 
dead, and guidance the wanderers, in order that defilement may be cleansed, 
error corrected, and what was dead restored to life?

CHAPTER XXV.

    That Deity should be born in our nature, ought not reasonably to 
present any strangeness to the minds of those who do not take too narrow a 
view of things. For who, when he takes a survey of the universe, is so 
simple as not to believe that there is Deity in everything, penetrating it, 
embracing it, and seated in it? For all things depend on Him Who is (6) nor 
can there be anything which has not its being in Him Who is. If, therefore, 
all things are in Him, and He in all things, why are they scandalized at 
the plan of Revelation when it teaches that God was born among men, that 
same God Whom we are convinced is even now not outside mankind? For 
although this last form of God's presence amongst us is not the same as 
that former presence, still His existence amongst us equally both then and 
now is evidenced; only now He Who holds together Nature in existence is 
transfused in us; while at that other time He was transfused throughout our 
nature, in order that our nature might by this transfusion of the Divine 
become itself divine, rescued as it was from death, and put beyond the 
reach of the caprice of the antagonist. For His return from death becomes 
to our mortal race the commencement of our return to the immortal life.

CHAPTER XXVI.

    Still in his examination of the amount of justice and wisdom 
discoverable in this Dispensation a person is, perhaps, induced to 
entertain the thought that it was by means of a certain amount of deceit 
that God carried out this scheme on our behalf. For that not by pure Deity 
alone, but by Deity veiled in human nature, God, without the knowledge of 
His enemy, got within the lines of him who had man in his power, is in some 
measure a fraud and a surprise; seeing that it is the peculiar way with 
those who want to deceive to divert in another direction the expectations 
of their intended victims, and then to effect something quite different 
from what these latter expected. But he who has regard for truth will agree 
that the essential qualities of justice and wisdom are before all things 
these; viz. of justice, to give to every one according to his due; of 
wisdom, not to pervert justice, and yet at the same time not to dissociate 
the benevolent aim of the love of mankind from the verdict of justice, but 
skilfully to combine both these requisites together, in regard to justice 
(7) returning the due recompense, in regard to kindness not swerving from 
the aim of that love of man. Let us see, then, whether these two qualities 
are not to be observed in that which took place. That repayment, adequate 
to the debt, by which the deceiver was in his turn deceived, exhibits the 
justice of the dealing, while the object aimed at is a testimony to the 
goodness of Him who effected it. It is, indeed, the property of justice to 
assign to every one those particular results of which he has sunk already 
the foundations and the causes, just as the earth returns its harvests 
according to the kinds of seeds thrown into it; while it is the property of 
wisdom, in its very manner of giving equivalent returns, not to depart from 
the kinder course. Two persons may both mix poison with food, one with the 
design of taking life, the other with the design of saving that life; the 
one using it as a poison, the other only as an antidote to poison; and in 
no way does the manner of the cure adopted spoil the aim and purpose of the 
benefit intended; for although a mixture of poison with the food may be 
effected by both of these persons alike, yet looking at their intention we 
are indignant with the one and approve the other; so in this instance, by 
the reasonable rule of justice, he who practised deception receives in 
return that very treatment, the seeds of which no had himself sown of his 
own free will. He who first deceived man by the bait of sensual pleasure is 
himself deceived by the presentment of the human form. But as regards the 
aim and purpose of what took place, a change in the direction of the nobler 
is involved; for whereas he, the enemy, effected his deception for the ruin 
of our nature, He Who is at once the just, and good, and wise one, used His 
device, in which there was deception, for the salvation of him who had 
perished, and thus not only conferred benefit on the lost one, but on him, 
too, who had wrought our ruin. For from this approximation of death to 
life, of darkness to light, of corruption to incorruption, there is 
effected an obliteration of what is worse, and a passing away of it into 
nothing, while benefit is conferred on him who is freed from those evils. 
For it is as when some worthless material has been mixed with gold, and the 
gold-refiners (8) burn up the foreign and refuse part in the consuming 
fire, and so restore the more precious substance to its natural lustre: 
(not that the separation is effected without difficulty, for it takes time 
for the fire by its melting force to cause the baser matter to disappear; 
but for all that, this melting away of the actual thing that was embedded 
in it to the injury of its beauty is a kind of healing of the gold.) In the 
same way when death, and corruption, and darkness, and every other offshoot 
of evil had grown into the nature of the author of evil, the approach of 
the Divine power, acting like fire (9), and making that unnatural accretion 
to disappear, thus by purgation (1) of the evil becomes a blessing to that 
nature, though the separation is agonizing. Therefore even the adversary 
himself will not be likely to dispute that what took place was both just 
and salutary, that is, if he shall have attained to a perception of the 
boon. For it is now as with those who for their cure are subjected to the 
knife and the cautery; they are angry with the doctors, and wince with the 
pain of the incision; but if recovery of health be the result of this 
treatment, and the pain of the cautery passes away, they will feel grateful 
to those who have wrought this cure upon them. In like manner, when, after 
long periods of time, the evil of our nature, which now is mixed up with it 
and has grown with its growth, has been expelled, and when there has been a 
restoration of those who are now lying in Sin to their primal state, a 
harmony of thanksgiving will arise from all creation (2), as well from 
those who in the process of the purgation have suffered chastisement, as 
from those who needed not any purgation at all. These and the like benefits 
the great mystery of the Divine incarnation bestows. For in those points in 
which He was mingled with humanity, passing as He did through all the 
accidents proper to human nature, such as birth, rearing, growing up, and 
advancing even to the taste of death, He accomplished all the results 
before mentioned, freeing both man from evil, and healing even the 
introducer of evil himself. For the chastisement, however painful, of moral 
disease is a healing of its weakness.

CHAPTER XXVII

    It is, then, completely in keeping with this, that He Who was thus 
pouring Himself into our nature should accept this commixture in all its 
accidents. For as they who wash clothes do not pass over some of the dirt 
and cleanse the rest, but clear the whole cloth from all its stains, from 
one end to the other, that the cloak by being uniformly brightened from 
washing may be throughout equal to its own standard of cleanness, in like 
manner, since the life of man was defiled by sin, in its beginning, end, 
and all its intermediate states, there needed an abstergent force to 
penetrate the whole, and not to; mend some one part by cleansing, while it 
left another unattended to. For this reason it is that, seeing that our 
life has been included between boundaries on either side, one, I mean, at 
its beginning, and the other at its ending, at each boundary the force that 
is capable of correcting our nature is to be found, attaching itself to the 
beginning, and extending to the end, and touching all between those two 
points (3). Since, then, there is for all men only one way of entrance into 
this life of ours, from whence was He Who was making His entrance amongst 
us to transport Himself into our life? From heaven, perhaps some one will 
say, who rejects with contempt, as base and degraded, this species of 
birth, i. e. the human. But there was no humanity in heaven: and in that 
supra-mundane existence no disease of evil had been naturalized; but He Who 
poured Himself into man adopted this commixture with a view to the benefit 
of it. Where, then, evil was not and the human life was not lived, how is 
it that any one seeks there the scene of this wrapping up of God in man, 
or, rather, not man, but some phantom resemblance of man? In what could the 
recovery of our nature have consisted if, while this earthly creature was 
diseased and needed this recovery, something else, amongst the heavenly 
beings, had experienced the Divine sojourning? It is impossible for the 
sick man to be healed, unless his suffering member receives the healing. 
If, therefore, while this sick part was on earth, omnipotence had touched 
it not, but had regarded only its own dignity, this its pre- occupation 
with matters with which we had nothing in common would have been of no 
benefit to man. And with regard to the undignified in the case of Deity we 
can make no distinction; that is, if it is allowable to conceive at all of 
anything beneath the dignity of Deity beside evil. On the contrary, for one 
who forms such a narrow-minded view of the greatness of the Deity as to 
make it consist in inability to admit of fellowship with the peculiarities 
of our nature, the degradation is in no point lessened by the Deity being 
conformed to the fashion of a heavenly rather than of an earthly body. For 
every created being is distant, by an equal degree of inferiority, from 
that which is the Highest, Who is unapproachable by reason of the sublimity 
of His Being: the whole universe is in value the same distance beneath Him. 
For that which is absolutely inaccessible does not allow access to some one 
thing while it is unapproachable by another, but it transcends all 
existences by an equal sublimity. Neither, therefore, is the earth further 
removed from this dignity, nor the heavens closer to it, nor do the things 
which have their existence within each of these elemental worlds differ at 
all from each other in this respect, that some are allowed to be in contact 
with the inaccessible Being, while others are forbidden the approach. 
Otherwise we must suppose that the power which governs the Universe does 
not equally pervade the whole, but in some parts is in excess, in others is 
deficient. Consequently, by this difference of less or more in quantity or 
quality, the Deity will appear in the light of something composite and out 
of agreement with itself; if, that is, we could suppose it, as viewed in 
its essence, to be far away from us, whilst it is a close neighbour to some 
other creature, and from that proximity easily apprehended. But on this 
subject of that exalted dignity true reason looks neither downward nor 
upward in the way of comparison; for all things sink to a level beneath the 
power which presides over the Universe: so that if it shall be thought by 
them that any earthly nature is unworthy of this intimate connection with 
the Deity, neither can any other be found which has such worthiness. But if 
all things equally fall short of this dignity, one thing there is that is 
not beneath the dignity of God, and that is, to do good to him that needed 
it. If we confess, then, that where the disease was, there the healing 
power attended, what is there in this belief which is foreign to the proper 
conception of the Deity?

CHAPTER XXVIII.

    BUT they deride our state of nature, and din into our ears the manner 
of our being born, supposing in this way to make the mystery ridiculous, as 
if it were unbecoming in God by such an entrance into the world as this to 
connect Himself with the fellowship of the human life. But we touched upon 
this point before, when we said that the only thing which is essentially 
degraded is moral evil or whatever has an affinity with such evil; whereas 
the orderly process of Nature, arranged as it has been by the Divine will 
and law, is beyond the reach of any misrepresentation on the score of 
wickedness: otherwise this accusation would reach up to the Author of 
Nature, if anything connected with Nature were to be found fault with as 
degraded and unseemly. If, then, the Deity is separate only from evil, and 
if there is no nature in evil, and if the mystery declares that God was 
born in man but not in evil; and if, for man, there is but one way of 
entrance upon life, namely that by which the embryo passes on to the stage 
of life, what other mode of entrance upon life would they prescribe for 
God? these people, I mean, who, while they judge it fight and proper that 
the nature which evil had weakened should be visited by the Divine power, 
yet take offence at this special method of the visitation, not remembering 
that the whole organization of the body is of equal value throughout, and 
that nothing in it, of all the elements that contribute to the continuance 
of the animal life, is liable to the charge of being worthless or wicked. 
For the whole arrangement of the bodily organs and limbs has been 
constructed with one end in view, and that is, the continuance in life of 
humanity; and while the other organs of the body conserve the present 
actual vitality of men, each being apportioned to a different operation, 
and by their means the faculties of sense and action are exercised, the 
generative organs on the contrary involve a forecast of the future, 
introducing as they do, by themselves, their counteracting transmission for 
our race. Looking, therefore, to their utility, to which of those parts 
which are deemed more honourable are these inferior(4)? Nay, than which 
must they not in all reason be deemed more worthy of honour? For not by the 
eye, or ear, or tongue, or any other sense, is the continuation of our race 
carried on. These, as has been remarked, pertain to the enjoyment of the 
present. But by those other organs the immortality of humanity is secured, 
so that death, though ever operating against us, thus in a certain measure 
becomes powerless and ineffectual, since Nature, to baffle him, is ever as 
it were throwing herself into the breach through those who come 
successively into being. What unseemliness, then, is contained in our 
revelation of God mingled with the life of humanity through those very 
means by which Nature carries on the combat against death?

CHAPTER XXIX.

    BUT they change their ground and endeavour to vilify our faith in 
another way. They ask, if what took place was not to the dishonour of God 
or unworthy of Him, why did He delay the benefit so long? Why, since evil 
was in the beginning, did He not cut off its further progress?--To this we 
have a concise answer; viz. that this delay in conferring the benefit was 
owing to wisdom and a provident regard for that which would be a gain for 
our nature. In diseases, for instance, of the body, when some corrupt 
humour spreads unseen beneath the pores, before all the unhealthy secretion 
has been detected on the skin, they who treat diseases by the rules of art 
do not use such medicines as would harden the flesh, but they wait till all 
that lurks within comes out upon the surface, and then, with the disease 
unmasked, apply their remedies. When once, then, the disease of evil had 
fixed itself in the nature of mankind, He, the universal Healer, waited for 
the time when no form of wickedness was left still hidden in that nature. 
For this reason it was that He did not produce his healing for man's 
disease immediately on Cain's hatred and murder of his brother; for the 
wickedness of those who were destroyed in the days of Noah had not yet 
burst into a flame, nor had that terrible disease of Sodomite lawlessness 
been displayed, nor the Egyptians' war against God(5), nor the pride of 
Assyria, nor the Jews' bloody persecution of God's saints, nor Herod's 
cruel murder of the children, nor whatever else is recorded, or if 
unrecorded was done in the generations that followed, the root of evil 
budding forth in divers manners in the wilful purposes of man. When, then, 
wickedness had reached its utmost height, and there was no form of 
wickedness which men had not dared to do, to the end that the healing 
remedy might pervade the whole of the diseased system, He, accordingly, 
ministers to the disease; not at its beginning, but when it had been 
completely developed.

CHAPTER XXX.

    IF, however, any one thinks to refute our argument on this ground, that 
even after the application of the remedial process the life of man is still 
in discord through its errors, let us lead him to the truth by an example 
taken from familiar things. Take, for instance, the case of a serpent; if 
it receives a deadly blow on the head, the hinder part of the coil is not 
at once deadened along with it; but, while the head is dead, the tail part 
is still animated with its own particular spirit, and is not deprived of 
its vital motion: in like manner we may see Sin struck its deadly blow and 
yet in its remainders still vexing the life of man. But then they give up 
finding fault with the account of Revelation on these points, and make 
another charge  against it; viz. that the Faith does not reach all mankind. 
"But why is it," they ask, "that all men do not obtain the grace, but that, 
while some adhere to the Word, the portion who remain unbelieving is no 
small one; either because God was unwilling to bestow his benefit 
ungrudgingly upon all, or because He was altogether unable to do so?" Now 
neither of these alternatives can defy criticism. For it is unworthy of 
God, either that He should not will what is good, or that He should be 
unable to do it. "If, therefore, the Faith is a good thing, why," they ask, 
"does not its grace come upon all men?" Now(6), if in our representation of 
the Gospel mystery we had so stated the matter as that it was the Divine 
will that the Faith should be so granted away amongst mankind that some men 
should be called, while the rest had no share in the calling, occasion 
would be given for bringing such a charge against this Revelation. But if 
the call came with equal meaning to all and makes no distinction as to 
worth, age, or different national characteristics (for it was for this 
reason that at the very first beginning of the proclamation of the Gospel 
they who ministered the Word were, by Divine inspiration, all at once 
enabled to speak in the language of any nation, viz. in order that no one 
might be destitute of a share in the blessings of evangelical instruction), 
with what reasonableness can they still charge it upon God that the Word 
has not influenced all mankind? For He Who holds the sovereignty of the 
universe, out of the excess of this regard for man, permitted something to 
be under our own control, of which each of us alone is master. Now this is 
the will, a thing that cannot be enslaved, and of self- determining power, 
since it is seated in the liberty of thought and mind. Therefore such a 
charge might more justly be transferred to those who have not attached 
themselves to the Faith, instead of resting on Him Who has called them to 
believe. For even when Peter at the beginning preached the Gospel in a 
crowded assembly of the Jews, and three thousand at once received the 
Faith, though those who disbelieved were more in number than the believers, 
they did not attach blame to the Apostle on the ground of their disbelief. 
It was, indeed, not in reason, when the grace of the Gospel had been 
publicly set forth, for one who had absented himself from it of his own 
accord to lay the blame of his exclusion on another rather than himself.

CHAPTER XXXI.

    YET, even in their reply to this, or the like, they are not at a loss 
for a contentious rejoinder. For they assert that God, if He had been so 
pleased, might have forcibly drawn those, who were not inclined to yield, 
to accept the Gospel message. But where then would have been their free 
will? Where their virtuous merit? Where their meed of praise from their 
moral directors? It belongs only to inanimate or irrational creatures to be 
brought round by the will of another to his purpose; whereas the reasoning 
and intelligent nature, if it lays aside its freedom of action, loses at 
the same time the gracious gift of intellect. For upon what is he to employ 
any faculty of thought, if his power of choosing anything according to his 
inclination lies in the will of another? But then, if the will remains 
without the capacity of action, virtue necessarily disappears, since it is 
shackled by the enforced quiescence of the will. Then, if virtue does not 
exist, life loses its value, reason moves in accordance with fatalism, the 
praise of moral guardians(7) is gone, sin may be indulged in without risk, 
and the difference between the courses of life is obliterated. For who, 
henceforth, could with any reason condemn profligacy, or praise sobriety? 
since s every one would have this ready answer, that nothing of all the 
things we are inclined to is in our own power, but that by some superior 
and ruling influence the wills of men are brought round to the purpose of 
one who has the mastery over them. The conclusion, then is that it is not 
the goodness of God that is chargeable with the fact that the Faith is not 
engendered in all men, but rather the disposition of those by whom the 
preaching of the Word is received.

 CHAPTER XXXII.

    WHAT other objection is alleged by our adversaries? This; that (to take 
the preferable view(9)) it was altogether needless that that, transcendent 
Being should submit to the experience of death, but He might independently 
of this, through the superabundance of His power, have wrought with ease 
His purpose; still, if for some ineffable reason or other it was absolutely 
necessary that so it should be, at least He ought not to have been 
subjected to the contumely of such an ignominious kind of death. What 
death, they ask, could be more ignominious than that by crucifixion? What 
answer can we make to this? Why, that the death is rendered necessary by 
the birth, and that He Who had determined once for all to share the nature 
of man must pass through all the peculiar conditions of that nature. 
Seeing, then, that the life of man is determined between two boundaries, 
had He, after having passed the one, not touched the other that follows, 
His proposed design would have remained only half fulfilled, from His not 
having touched that second condition of our nature. Perhaps, however, one 
who exactly understands the mystery would be justified rather in saying 
that, instead of the death occurring in consequence of the birth, the birth 
on the contrary was accepted by Him for the sake of the death; for He Who 
lives for ever did not sink down into the conditions of a bodily birth from 
any need to live, but to call us back from death to life. Since, then, 
there was needed a lifting up from death for the whole of our nature, He 
stretches forth a hand as it were to prostrate man, and stooping down to 
our dead corpse He came so far within the grasp of death as to touch a 
state of deadness, and then in His own body to bestow on our nature the 
principle of the resurrection, raising as He did by His power along with 
Himself the; whole man. For since from no other source than from the 
concrete lump of our nature(1) had come that flesh, which was the 
receptacle of the Godhead and in the resurrection was raised up together 
with that Godhead, therefore just in the same way as, in the instance of 
this body of ours, the operation of one of the organs of sense is felt at 
once by the whole system, as one with that member, so also the resurrection 
principle of this Member, as though the whole of mankind was a single 
living being, passes through the entire race, being imparted from the 
Member to the whole by virtue of the continuity and oneness of the nature. 
What, then, is there beyond the bounds of probability in what this 
Revelation teaches us; viz. that He Who stands upright stoops to one who 
has fallen, in order to lift him up from his prostrate condition? And as to 
the Cross, whether it possesses some other and deeper meaning, those who 
are skilled in mysticism may explain; but, however that may be, the 
traditional teaching which has reached us is as follows. Since all things 
in the Gospel, both deeds and words, have a sublime and heavenly meaning, 
and there is nothing in it which is not such, that is, which does not 
exhibit a complete mingling of the human with the Divine, where the 
utterance exerted and the deeds enacted are human but the secret sense 
represents the Divine, it would follow that in this particular as well as 
in the rest we must not regard only the one element and overlook the other; 
but in the fact of this death we must contemplate the human feature, while 
in the manner of it we must be anxious to find the Divine(2). For since it 
is the property of the Godhead to pervade all things, and to extend itself 
through the length and breadth of the substance of existence in every part-
-for nothing would continue to be if it remained not within the existent; 
and that which is this existent properly and primarily is the Divine Being, 
Whose existence in the world the continuance of all things that are forces 
us to believe in,- -this is the very thing we learn from the figure of the 
Cross l it is divided into four parts, so that there are the projections, 
four in number, from the central point where the whole converges upon 
itself; because He Who at the hour of His pre-arranged death was stretched 
upon it is He Who binds together all things into Himself, and by Himself 
brings to one harmonious agreement the diverse natures of actual 
existences. For in these existences there is the idea either of something 
above, or of something below, or else the thought passes to the confines 
sideways. If, therefore, you take into your consideration the system of 
things above the heavens or of things below the earth, or of things at the 
boundaries of the universe on either side, everywhere the presence of Deity 
anticipates your thought as the sole observable power that in every part of 
existing things holds in a state of being all those things. Now whether we 
ought to call this Existence Deity, or Mind, or Power, or Wisdom, or any 
other lofty term which might be better able to express Him Who is above 
all, our argument has no quarrel with the appellation or name or form of 
phrase used. Since, then, all creation looks to Him, and is about and 
around Him, and through Him is coherent with itself, things above being 
through  Him conjoined to things below and things, lateral to themselves, 
it was right that not by hearing only we should be conducted to the full 
understanding of the Deity, but that sight also should be our teacher in 
these sublime subjects for thought; and it is from sight that the mighty 
Paul starts when he initiates(3) the people of Ephesus in the mysteries, 
and imbues them through his instructions with the power of knowing what is 
that "depth and height and breadth and length." In fact he designates each 
projection of the Cross by its proper appellation. The upper part he calls 
height, the lower depth, and the side extensions breadth and length; and in 
another passage(4) he makes his thought still clearer to the Philippians, 
to whom be says, "that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of 
things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth." In that 
passage he includes in one appellation the centre and projecting arms(5), 
calling "things in earth "all that is in the middle between things in 
heaven and things under the earth. Such is the lesson we learn in regard to 
the mystery of the Cross. And the subsequent events which the narrative 
contains follow so appropriately that, as even unbelievers must admit, 
there is nothing in them adverse to the proper conceptions of the Deity. 
That He did not abide in death, that the wounds which His body had received 
from the iron of the nails and spear offered no impediment to His rising 
again, that after His resurrection He showed Himself as He pleased to His 
disciples, that when He wished to be present with them He was in their 
midst without being seen, as needing no entrance through open doors, and 
that He strengthened the disciples by the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, 
and that He promised to be amongst them, and that no partition wall should 
intervene between them and Him, and that to the sight He ascended to Heaven 
while to the mind He was everywhere; all these, and whatever like facts the 
history of Him comprises, need no assistance from arguments to show that 
they are signs of deity and of a sublime and supereminent power. With 
regard to them therefore I do not deem it necessary to go into any detail, 
inasmuch as their description of itself shows the supernatural character. 
But since the dispensation of the washing (whether we choose to call it 
baptism, or illumination, or regeneration; for we make the name no subject 
of controversy) is a part of our revealed doctrines, it may be as well to 
enter on a short discussion of this as well.

CHAPTER XXXIII.

    FOR when they have heard from us something to this effect--that when 
the mortal passes into life it follows necessarily that, as that first 
birth leads only to the existence of mortality, another birth should be 
discovered, a birth which neither begins nor ends with corruption, but one 
which conducts the person begotten to an immortal existence, in order that, 
as what is begotten of a mortal birth has necessarily a mortal subsistence, 
so from a birth which admits not corruption that which is born may be 
superior to the corruption of death; when, I say, they have heard this and 
the like from us and are besides instructed as to the process,--namely that 
it is prayer and the invocation of heavenly grace, and water, and faith, by 
which the mystery of regeneration is accomplished,--they still remain 
incredulous and have an eye only for the outward and visible, as if that 
which is operated corporeally(6) concurred not with the fulfilment of God's 
promise. How, they ask, can prayer and the invocation of Divine power over 
the water be the foundation of life in those who have been thus initiated? 
In reply to them, unless they be of a very obstinate disposition, one 
single consideration suffices to bring them to an acquiescence in our 
doctrine. For let us in our turn ask them about that process of the carnal 
generation which every one can notice. How does that something which is 
cast for the beginnings of the formation of a living being become a Man? In 
that case, most certainly, there is no method whatever that can discover 
for us, by any possible reasoning, even the probable truth. For what 
correlation is there between the definition of man and the quality 
observable in that something? Man, when once he is put together, is a 
reasoning and intellectual being, capable of thought and knowledge; but 
that something is to be observed only in its quality of humidity, and the 
mind grasps nothing in it beyond that which is seen by the sense of sight. 
The reply, therefore, which we might expect to receive from those whom we 
questioned as to how it is credible that a man is compounded from that 
humid element, is the very reply which we make when questioned about the 
regeneration that takes place through the water. Now in that other case any 
one so questioned has this reply ready at hand, that that element becomes a 
man by a Divine power, wanting which, the element is motionless and 
inoperative. If, therefore, in that instance the subordinate matter does 
not make the man, but the Divine power changes that visible thing into a 
man's nature, it would be utterly unfair for them, when in the one case 
they testify to such power in God, in this other department to suppose that 
the Deity is too weak to accomplish His will. What is there common, they 
ask, between water and life? What is there common, we ask them in return, 
between humidity and God's image? In that case there is no paradox if, God 
so willing, what is humid changes into the most rare creature(7). Equally, 
then, in this case we assert that there is nothing strange when the 
presence of a Divine influence transforms what is born with a corruptible  
nature into a state of incorruption.

CHAPTER XXXIV.

    BUT they ask for proof of this presence of the Deity when invoked for 
the sanctification of the baptismal process(8). Let the person who requires 
this evidence recall to mind the result of our inquiries further back. The 
reasoning by which we established that the power which was manifested to us 
through the flesh was really a Divine power, is the defence of that which 
we now say. For when it has been shown that He Who was manifested in the 
flesh, and then exhibited His nature by the miracles which He wrought, was 
God, it is also at the same time shown that He is present in that process, 
as often as He is invoked. For, as of everything that exists there is some 
peculiarity which indicates its nature, so truth is the distinctive 
peculiarity of the Divine nature. Well, then, He has promised that He will 
always be present with those that call upon Him, that He is in the midst of 
those that believe, that He remains among them collectively and has special 
intercourse with each one. We can no longer, then, need any other proof of 
the presence of the Deity in the things that are done in Baptism, believing 
as we do that He is God by reason of the miracles which He wrought, and 
knowing as we do that it is the peculiarity of the Godhead to be free from 
any touch of falsehood, and confidently holding as we do that the thing 
promised was involved in the truthfulness of its announcement. The 
invocation by prayer, then, which precedes this Divine Dispensation 
constitutes an abundance of proof that what is effected is done by God. For 
if in the case of that other kind of man-formation the impulses of the 
parents, even though they do not invoke the Deity, yet by the power of God, 
as we have before said, mould the embryo, and if this power is withheld 
their eagerness is ineffectual and useless, how much more will the object 
be accomplished in that spiritual mode of generation, where both God has 
promised that He will be present in the process and, as we have believed, 
has put power from Himself into the work, and, besides, our own will is 
bent upon that object; supposing, that is, that the aid which comes through 
prayer has at the same time been duly called in? For as they who pray God 
that the sun may shine on them in no way blunt the promptitude of that 
which is actually going to take place, yet no one will say that the zeal of 
those who thus pray is useless on the ground that they pray God for what 
must happen, in the same way they who, resting on the truthfulness of His 
promise, are firmly persuaded that His grace is surely present in those who 
are regenerate in this mystical Dispensation, either themselves make(9) an 
actual addition to that grace, or at all events do not cause the existing 
grace to miscarry. For that the grace is there is a matter of faith, on 
account of Him Who has promised to give it being Divine; while the 
testimony as to His Divinity comes through the Miracles(1). Thus, then, 
that the Deity is present in all the baptismal process(2) admits of no 
question.

CHAPTER XXXV

    BUT the descent into the water, and the trine immersion of the person 
in it, involves another mystery. For since the method of our salvation was 
made effectual not so much by His precepts in the way of teaching(3) as by 
the deeds of Him Who has realized an actual fellowship with man, and has 
effected life as a living fact, so that by means of the flesh which He has 
assumed, and at the same time deified(4), everything kindred and related 
may be saved along with it, it was necessary that some means should be 
devised by which there might be, in the baptismal process, a kind of 
affinity and likeness between him who follows and Him Who leads the way. 
Needful, therefore, is it to see what features are to be observed in the 
Author of our life, in order that the imitation on the part of those that 
follow may be regulated, as the Apostle says, after the pattern of the 
Captain of our salvation(5). For, as it is they who are actually drilled 
into measured and orderly movements in arms by skilled drill-masters, who 
are advanced to dexterity in handling their weapons by what they see with 
their eyes, whereas he who does not practise what is shown him remains 
devoid of such dexterity, in the same way it is imperative on all those who 
have an equally earnest desire for the Good as He has, to be followers by 
the path of an exact imitation of Him Who leads the way to salvation, and 
to carry into action what He has shown them. It is, in fact, impossible for 
persons to reach the same goal unless they travel by the same ways. For as 
persons who are at a loss how to thread the turns of mazes, when they 
happen to fall in with some one who has experience of them, get to the end 
of those various misleading turnings in the chambers by following him 
behind, which they could not do, did they not follow him their leader step 
by step, so too, I pray you mark, the labyrinth of this our life cannot be 
threaded by the faculties of human nature unless a man pursues that same 
path as He did Who, though once in it, yet got beyond the difficulties 
which hemmed Him in. I apply this figure of a labyrinth to that prison of 
death, which is without an egress(6) and environs the wretched race of 
mankind. What, then, have we beheld in the case of the Captain of our 
salvation? A three days' state of death and then life again. Now some sort 
of resemblance in us to such things has to be planned. What, then, is the 
plan by which in us too a resemblance to that which took place in Him is 
completed? Everything that is affected by death has its proper and natural 
place, and that is the earth in which it is laid and hidden. Now earth and 
water have much mutual affinity. Alone of the elements they have weight and 
gravitate downwards; they mutually abide in each other; they are mutually 
confined. Seeing, then, the death of the Author of our life subjected Him 
to burial in earth and was in accord with our common nature, the imitation 
which we enact of that death is expressed in the neighbouring element. And 
as He, that Man from above(7) having taken deadness on Himself, after His 
being deposited in the earth, returned back to life the third day, so every 
one who is knitted to Him by virtue of his bodily form, looking forward to 
the same successful issue, I mean this arriving at life by having, instead 
of earth, water poured on him(8), and so submitting to that element, has 
represented for him in the three movements the three-days-delayed grace of 
the resurrection. Something like this has been said in what has gone 
before, namely, that by the Divine providence death has been introduced as 
a dispensation into the nature of man, so that, sin having flowed away at 
the dissolution of the union of soul and body, man, through the 
resurrection, might be refashioned, sound, passionless, stainless, and 
removed from any touch of evil. In the case however of the Author of our 
Salvation this dispensation of death reached its fulfilment, having 
entirely accomplished its special purpose. For in His death, not only were 
things that once were one put asunder, but also things that had been 
disunited were again brought together; so that in this dissolution of 
things that had naturally grown together, I mean, the soul and body, our 
nature might be purified, and this return to union of these severed 
elements might secure freedom from the contamination of any foreign 
admixture. But as regards those who follow this Leader, their nature does 
not admit of an exact and entire imitation, but it receives now as much as 
it is capable of receiving, while it reserves the remainder for the time 
that comes after. In what, then, does this imitation consist? It consists 
in the effecting the suppression of that admixture of sin, in the figure of 
mortification that is given by the water, not certainly a complete 
effacement, but a kind of break in the continuity of the evil, two things 
concurring to this removal of sin-- the penitence of the transgressor and 
his imitation of the death. By these two things the man is in a measure 
freed from his congenital tendency to evil; by his penitence he advances to 
a hatred of and averseness from sin, and by his death he works out the 
suppression of the evil. But had it been possible for him in his imitation 
to undergo a complete dying, the result would be not imitation but 
identity; and the evil of our nature would so entirely vanish that, as the 
Apostle says, "he would die unto sin once for all(9)." But since, as has 
been said, we only so far imitate the transcendent Power as the poverty of 
our nature is capable of, by having the water thrice poured on us and 
ascending again up from the water, we enact that saving burial and 
resurrection which took place on the third day, with this thought in our 
mind, that as we have power over the water both to be in it and arise out 
of it, so He too, Who has the universe at His sovereign disposal, immersed 
Himself in death, as we in the water, to return(1) to His own blessedness. 
If, therefore, one looks to that which is in reason, and judges of the 
results according to the power inherent in either party, one will discover 
no disproportion in these results, each in proportion to the measure of his 
natural power working out the effects that are within his reach. For, as it 
is in the power of man, if he is so disposed, to touch the water and vet be 
safe, with infinitely greater ease may death be handled by the Divine Power 
so as to be in it and yet not to be changed by it injuriously. Observe, 
then, that it is necessary for us to rehearse beforehand in the water the 
grace of the resurrection, to the intent that we may understand that, as 
far as facility goes, it is the same thing for us to be baptized with water 
and to rise again from death. But as in matters that concern our life here, 
there are some which take precedence of others, as being those without 
which the result could not be achieved, although if the beginning be 
compared with the end, the beginning so contrasted will seem of no account 
(for what equality, for instance, is there between the man and that which 
is laid as a foundation for the constitution of his animal being? And yet 
if that had never been, neither would this be which we see), in like manner 
that which happens in the great resurrection, essentially vaster though it 
be, has its beginnings and its causes here; it is not, in fact, possible 
that that should take place, unless this had gone before; I mean, that 
without the laver of regeneration it is impossible for the man to be in the 
resurrection; but in saying this I do not regard the mere remoulding and 
refashioning of our composite body; for towards this it is absolutely 
necessary that human nature should advance, being constrained thereto by 
its own laws according to the dispensation of Him Who has so ordained, 
whether it have received the grace of the laver, or whether it remains 
without that initiation but I am thinking of the restoration to a blessed 
and divine condition, separated from all shame and sorrow. For not 
everything that is granted in the resurrection a return to existence will 
return to the same kind of life. There is a wide interval between those who 
have been purified, and those who still need purification. For those in 
whose life- time here the purification by the laver has preceded, there is 
a restoration to a kindred state. Now, to the pure, freedom from passion is 
that kindred state, and that in this freedom from passion blessedness 
consists, admits of no dispute. But as for those whose weaknesses have 
become inveterate(2), and to whom no purgation of their defilement has been 
applied, no mystic water, no invocation of the Divine power, no amendment 
by repentance, it is absolutely necessary that they should come to be in 
something proper to their case,--just as the furnace is the proper thing 
for gold alloyed with dross,--in order that, the vice which has been mixed 
up in them being melted away after long succeeding ages, their nature may 
be restored pure again to God. Since, then, there is a cleansing virtue in 
fire and water, they who by the mystic water have washed away the 
defilement of their sin have no further need of the other form of 
purification, while they who have not been admitted to that form of 
purgation must needs be purified by fire.

CHAPTER XXXVI.

    FOR common Sense as well as the teaching of Scripture shows that it is 
impossible for one who has not thoroughly cleansed himself from all the 
stains arising from evil to be admitted amongst the heavenly company. This 
is a thing which, though little in itself, is the beginning and foundation 
of great blessings. I call it little on account of the facility of the 
means of amendment. For what difficulty is there in this matter? viz. to 
believe that God is everywhere, and that being in all things He is also 
present with those who call upon Him for His life-supporting power, and 
that, thus present, He does that which properly belongs to Him to do. Now, 
the work properly belonging to the Divine energy is the salvation of those 
who need it; and this salvation proves effectual(3) by means of the 
cleansing in the water; and he that has been so cleansed will participate 
in Purity; and true Purity is Deity. You see, then, how small a thing it is 
in its beginning, and how easily effected; I mean, faith and water; the 
first residing within the will, the latter being the nursery companion of 
the life of man. But as to the blessing which springs from these two 
things, oh! how great and how wonderful it is, that it should imply 
relationship with Deity itself!

CHAPTER XXXVII.

    BUT since the human being is a twofold creature, compounded of soul and 
body, it is necessary that the saved should lay hold of(4) the Author of 
the new life through both their component parts. Accordingly, the soul 
being fused into Him through faith derives from that the means and occasion 
of salvation; for the act of union with the life implies a fellowship with 
the life. But the body comes into fellowship and blending with the Author 
of our salvation in another way. For as they who owing to some act of 
treachery have taken poison, allay its deadly influence by means of some 
other drug (for it is necessary that the antidote should enter the human 
vitals in the same way as the deadly poison, in order to secure, through 
them, that the effect of the remedy may be distributed through the entire 
system), in like manner we, who have tasted the solvent of our nature(5), 
necessarily need something that may combine what has been so dissolved, so 
that such an antidote entering within us may, by its own counter-influence, 
undo the mischief introduced into the body by the poison. What, then, is 
this remedy to be? Nothing else than that very Body which has been shown to 
be superior to death, and has been the First-fruits of our life. For, in 
the manner that, as the Apostle says(6), a little leaven assimilates to 
itself the whole lump, so in like manner that body to which immortality has 
been given it by God, when it is in ours, translates and transmutes the 
whole into itself. For as by the admixture of a poisonous liquid with a 
wholesome one the whole drought is deprived of its deadly effect, so too 
the immortal Body, by being within that which receives it changes the whole 
to its own nature. Yet in no other way can anything enter within the body 
but by being transfused through the vitals by eating and drinking. It is, 
therefore, incumbent on the body to admit this life-producing power in the 
one way that its constitution makes possible. And since that Body only 
which was the receptacle of the Deity received this grace of immortality, 
and since it has been shown that in no other way was it possible for our 
body to become immortal, but by participating, in incorruption through its 
fellowship with that immortal Body, it will be necessary to consider how it 
was possible that that one Body, being for ever portioned to so many 
myriads of the faithful throughout the whole world, enters through that 
portion, whole into each individual and yet remains whole in itself. In 
order therefore, that our faith, with eyes fixed on logical probability, 
may harbour no doubt on the subject before us, it is fitting to make a 
slight digression in our argument, to consider the physiology of the body. 
Who is there that does not know that our bodily frame, taken by itself, 
possesses no life in its own proper subsistence, but that it is by the 
influx of a force or power from without that it holds itself together and 
continues in existence, and by a ceaseless motion that it draws to itself 
what it wants, and repels what is superfluous? When a leathern bottle is 
full of some liquid, and then the contents leak out at the bottom, it would 
not retain the contour of its full bulk unless there entered m at the top 
something else to fill up the vacuum; and thus a person, seeing the 
circumference of this bottle swollen to its full size, would know that this 
circumference did not really belong to the object which he sees, but that 
what was being poured in, by being in it, gave shape and roundness to the 
bulk. In the same way the mere framework of our body possesses nothing 
belonging to itself that is cognizable by us, to hold it together, but 
remains in existence owing to a force that is introduced into it. Now this 
power or force both is, and is called, nourishment. But it is not the same 
in all bodies that require aliment, but to each of them has been assigned a 
food adapted to its condition by Him who governs Nature. Some animals feed 
on roots which they dig up. Of others grass is the food, of others 
different kinds of flesh, but for man above all things bread; and, in order 
to continue and preserve the moisture of his body, drink, not simply water, 
but water frequently sweetened with wine, to join forces with our internal 
heat. He, therefore, who thinks of these things, thinks by implication(7) 
of the particular bulk of our body. For those things by being within me 
became my blood and flesh, the corresponding nutriment by its power of 
adaptation being changed into the form of my body. With these distinctions 
we must return to the consideration of the question before us. The question 
was, how can that one Body of Christ vivify the whole of mankind, all, that 
is, in whomsoever there is Faith, and yet, though divided amongst all, be 
itself not diminished? Perhaps, then, we are now not far from the probable 
explanation. If the subsistence of every body depends on nourishment, and 
this is eating and drinking, and in the case of our eating there is bread 
and in the case of our drinking water sweetened with wine, and if, as was 
explained at the beginning, the Word of God, Who is both God and the Word, 
coalesced with man's nature, and when He came in a body such as ours did 
not innovate on man's physical constitution so as to make it other than it 
was, but secured continuance for His own body by the customary and proper 
means, and controlled its subsistence by meat and drink, the former of 
which was bread,--just, then, as in the case of ourselves, as has been 
repeatedly said already, if a person sees bread he also, in a kind of way, 
looks on a human body, for by the bread being within it the bread becomes 
it, so also, in that other case, the body into which God entered, by 
partaking of the nourishment of bread, was, in a certain measure, the same 
with it; that nourishment, as we have said, changing itself into the nature 
of the body. For that which is peculiar to all flesh is acknowledged also 
in the case of that flesh, namely, that that Body too was maintained by 
bread; which Body also by the indwelling of God the Word was transmuted to 
the dignity of Godhead. Rightly, then, do we believe that now also the 
bread which is consecrated by the Word of God is changed into the Body of 
God the Word. For that Body was once, by implication, bread, but has been 
consecrated by the inhabitation of the Word that tabernacled in the flesh. 
Therefore, from the same cause as that by which the bread that was 
transformed in that Body was changed to a Divine potency, a similar result 
takes place now. For as in that case, too, the grace of the Word used to 
make holy the Body, the substance of which came of the bread, and in a 
manner was itself bread, so also in this case the bread, as says the 
Apostle(8), "is sanctified by the Word of God and prayer"; not that it 
advances by the process of eating(9) to the stage of passing into the body 
of the Word, but it is at once changed into the body by means of the Word, 
as the Word itself said, "This is My Body." Seeing, too, that all flesh is 
nourished by what is moist(for without this combination our earthly part 
would not continue to live), just as we support by food which is firm and 
solid the solid part of our body, in like manner we supplement the moist 
part from the kindred element; and this, when within us, by its faculty of 
being transmitted, is changed to blood, and especially if through the wine 
it receives the faculty of being transmuted into heat. Since, then, that 
God-containing flesh partook for its substance and support of this 
particular nourishment also, and since the God who was manifested infused 
Himself into perishable humanity for this purpose, viz. that by this 
communion with Deity mankind might at the same time be deified, for this 
end it is that, by dispensation of His grace, He disseminates Himself in 
every believer through that flesh, whose substance comes from bread and 
wine, blending Himself with the bodies of believers, to secure that, by 
this union with the immortal, man, too, may be a sharer in incorruption. He 
gives these gifts by virtue of the benediction  through which He 
transelements(1) the natural quality of these visible things to that 
immortal thing.

CHAPTER XXXVIII.

    There is now, I think, wanting in these remarks no answer to inquiries 
concerning the Gospel mystery, except that on Faith(2); which we give 
briefly in the present treatise. For those who require a more elaborate 
account we have already published it in other works of ours, in which we 
have explained the subject with all the earnestness and accuracy in our 
power. In those treatises we have both fought(3) controversially  with our 
opponents, and also have taken private consultation with ourselves as to 
the questions which have been brought against us. But in the present 
discussion we have thought it as well only to say just so much on the 
subject of faith as is involved in the language of the Gospel, namely, that 
one who is begotten by the spiritual regeneration may know who it is that 
begets him, and what sort of creature he becomes. For it is only this form 
of generation which has in it the power to become what it chooses to be.

CHAPTER XXXIX.

    For, while all things else that are born are subject to the impulse of 
those that beget them, the spiritual birth is dependent on the power of him 
who is being born. Seeing, then, that here   lies the hazard, namely, that 
he should not miss what is for his advantage, when to every one a free 
choice is thus open, it were well, I think, for him who is moved towards 
the begetting of himself, to determine by previous reasoning what kind of 
father is for his advantage, and of what element it is better for him that 
his nature should consist. For, as we have said, it is in the power of such 
a child as this to choose its parents. Since, then, there is a twofold 
division of existences, into created and uncreated, and since the uncreated 
world possesses within itself immutability and immobility, while the 
created is liable to change and alteration, of which will he, who with 
calculation and deliberation is to choose what is for his benefit, prefer 
to be the offspring; of that which is always found in a state of change, or 
of that which possesses a nature that is changeless, steadfast, and ever 
consistent and unvarying in goodness? Now there have been delivered to us 
in the Gospel three Persons and names through whom the  generation or birth 
of believers takes place, and he who is begotten by this Trinity is equally 
begotten of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost--for thus 
does the Gospel speak of the Spirit, that "that which is born of Spirit is 
spirit(4)," and it is "in Christ(5)" that Paul begets, and the Father is 
the "Father of all;" here, then, I beg, let the mind of the hearer be sober 
in its choice, lest it make itself the offspring of some inconstant nature, 
when it has it in its power to make the steadfast and unalterable nature 
the founder of its life. For according to the disposition of heart in one 
who comes to the Dispensation will that which is begotten in him exhibit 
its power; so that he who confesses that the Holy Trinity is uncreate 
enters on the steadfast unalterable life; while another, who through a 
mistaken conception sees only a created nature in the Trinity and then is 
baptized in that, has again been born into the shifting and alterable life. 
For that which is born is of necessity of one kindred with that which 
begets. Which, then, offers the greater advantage; to enter on the 
unchangeable life, or to be again tossed about by the  waves of this 
lifetime of uncertainty and change? Well, since it is evident to any one of 
the least understanding that what is stable is far more valuable than what 
is unstable, what is perfect than what is deficient, what needs not than 
what needs, and what has no further to advance but ever abides in the 
perfection of all that is good, than what climbs by progressive toil, it is 
incumbent upon every one, at least upon every one who is possessed of 
sense, to make an absolute choice of one or other of these two conditions, 
either to believe that the Holy Trinity belongs to the uncreated world, and 
so through the spiritual birth to make It the foundation of his own life, 
or, if he thinks that the Son or the Holy Ghost is external to the being of 
the first, the true, the good, God, I mean, of the Father, not to include 
these Persons in the belief which he takes upon him at the moment of his 
new birth, lest he unconsciously make himself over to that imperfect 
nature(6) which itself needs some one to make it good, and in a manner 
bring himself back again to something of the same nature as his own by thus 
removing his    faith(7) from that higher world. For whoever has bound 
himself to any created thing forgets that, as from the Deity, he has no 
longer hope of salvation. For all creation, owing to the whole equally 
proceeding from non- existence into being, has an intimate connection with 
itself; and as in the bodily organization all the  limbs have a natural and 
mutual coherence, though some have a downward, some an upward direction, so 
the world of created things is, viewed as the creation, in oneness with 
itself, and the differences in us, as regards abundance or deficiency, in 
no wise disjoint it from this natural coherence with itself. For in things 
which equally imply the idea of a previous non-existence, though there be a 
difference between them in other respects, as regards this point we 
discover no variation of nature. If, then, man, who is himself a created 
being, thinks that the Spirit and the Only-begotten God(8) are likewise 
created, the hope which he entertains of a change to a better state will be 
a vain one; for he only returns to himself(9). What happens then is on a 
par with the surmises of Nicodemus; he, when instructed by our Lord as to 
the necessity of being born from above, because he could not yet comprehend 
the meaning of the mystery, had his thoughts drawn back to his mother's 
womb(1). So that if a man does not conduct himself towards the uncreated 
nature, but to that which is kindred to, and equally in bondage with, 
himself, he is of the birth which is from below, and not of that which is 
from above. But the Gospel tells us that the birth of the saved is from 
above.

CHAPTER XL.

    But, as far as what has been already said, the instruction of this 
Catechism does not seem to me to be yet complete. For we ought, in my 
opinion, to take into consideration the sequel of this matter; which many 
of those who come to the grace of baptism(2) overlook, being led astray, 
and self-deceived, and indeed only seemingly, and not really, regenerate. 
For that change in our life which takes place through regeneration will not 
be change, if we continue in the state in which we were. I do not see how 
it is possible to deem one who is still in the same condition, and in whom 
there has been no change in the distinguishing features of his nature, to 
be any other than he was, it being palpable to every one that it is for a 
renovation and change of our nature that the saving birth is received. And 
yet human nature does not of itself admit of any change in baptism; neither 
the reason, nor the understanding, nor the scientific faculty, nor any 
other peculiar characteristic of man is a subject for change. Indeed the 
change would be for the worse if any one of these properties of our nature 
were exchanged away(3) for something else. If, then, the birth from above 
is a definite re-fashioning of the man, and yet these properties do not 
admit of change, it is a subject for inquiry what that is in him, by the 
changing of which the grace of regeneration is perfected. It is evident 
that when those evil features which mark our nature have been obliterated a 
change to a better state takes place. If, then, by being "washed," as says 
the Prophet(4), in that mystic bath we become "clean" in our wills and "put 
away the evil" of our souls, we thus become better men, and are changed to 
a better state. But if, when the bath has been applied to the body, the 
soul has not cleansed itself from the stains of its passions and 
affections, but the life after initiation keeps on a level with the 
uninitiate life, then, though it may be a bold thing to say, yet I will say 
it and will not shrink; in these cases the water is but water, for the gift 
of the Holy Ghost in no ways appears in him who is thus baptismally born; 
whenever, that  is, not only the deformity of anger(5), or the passion of 
greed, or the unbridled and unseemly  thought, with pride, envy, and 
arrogance, disfigures the Divine image, but the gains, too, of injustice 
abide with him, and the woman he has procured by adultery still even after 
that  ministers to his pleasures. If these and the like vices, after, as 
before, surround the life of the baptized, I cannot see in what respects he 
has been changed; for I observe him the same man as he was before. The man 
whom he has unjustly treated, the man whom he has falsely accused, the man 
whom he has forcibly deprived of his property, these, as far as they are 
concerned, see no change in him though he has been washed in the layer of 
baptism. They do not hear the cry of Zacchaeus from him as well: "If I have 
taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore fourfold(6)."  
What they said of him before his baptism, the same they now more fully 
declare; they call him by the same names, a covetous person, one who is 
greedy of what belongs to others, one who lives in luxury at the cost of 
men's calamities. Let such an one, therefore, who remains in the same moral 
condition as before, and then babbles to himself of the beneficial change 
he has received from baptism, listen to what Paul says: "If a man think 
himself to be something,  when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself(7)." For 
what you have not become, that you are not. "As many as received Him," thus 
speaks the Gospel of those who have been born again, "to them gave He power 
to become the sons of God(8)." Now the child born of any one is entirely of 
a kindred nature with his parent. If, then, you have received God, if you 
have become a child of God, make manifest in your disposition the God that 
is in you, manifest in yourself Him that begot you. By the same marks 
whereby we recognize God, must this  relationship to God of the son so born 
be exhibited. "He openeth His hand and filleth every living thing with His 
good pleasure." "He passeth over transgressions." "He repenteth Him of the 
evil." "The Lord is good  to all, and bringeth not on us His anger every   
day." "God is a righteous Lord, and there is   no injustice in Him(9) ;" 
and all other sayings of the like kind which are scattered for our 
instruction throughout the Scripture;--if you live amidst such things as 
these, you are a child of God indeed; but if you continue with the 
characteristic marks of vice in you, it is in vain that you babble to 
yourself of your birth from above. Prophecy will speak against you and say, 
"You are a 'son of man,' not a son of the Most High. You 'love vanity, and 
seek after leasing.' Know you not in what way man is  'made admirable(1)'? 
In no other way than by becoming holy."

    It will be necessary to add to what has been said this remaining 
statement also; viz. that those good things which are held out in the 
Gospels to those who have led a godly life, are not such as can be 
precisely described. For how is that possible with things which "eye hath 
not seen, neither ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of 
man(2)"? Indeed, the sinner's life of torment presents no equivalent to 
anything that pains the sense here. Even if some one of the punishments in 
that other world be named in terms that are well known here, the 
distinction is still not small. When you hear the word fire, you have been 
taught to think of a fire other than the fire we see, owing to something 
being added to that fire which in this there is not; for that fire is never 
quenched, whereas experience has discovered many ways of quenching this; 
and there is a great difference between a fire which can be extinguished, 
and one that does not admit of extinction. That fire, therefore, is 
something other than this. If, again, a person hears the word "worm," let 
not his thoughts, from the similarity of the term, be carried to the 
creature here that crawls upon the ground; for the addition that it "dieth 
not" suggests the thought of another reptile than that known here. Since, 
then, these things are set before us as to be expected in the life that 
follows this, being the natural outgrowth according to the righteous 
judgment of God, in the life of each, of his particular disposition, it 
must be the part of the wise not to regard the present, but that which 
follows after, and to lay down the foundations for that unspeakable 
blessedness during this short and fleeting life, and by a good choice to 
wean themselves from all experience of evil, now in their lifetime here, 
hereafter in their eternal recompense(3).